Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework.Guido Palazzo & Andreas Georg Scherer - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):71-88.
    Modern society is challenged by a loss of efficiency in national governance systems values, and lifestyles. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) discourse builds upon a conception of organizational legitimacy that does not appropriately reflect these changes. The problems arise from the a-political role of the corporation in the concepts of cognitive and pragmatic legitimacy, which are based on compliance to national law and on relatively homogeneous and stable societal expectations on the one hand and widely accepted rhetoric assuming that all members (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   258 citations  
  • Rhetoric, Cogency, and the Radically Social Character of Persuasion: Habermas's Argumentation Theory Revisited.William Rehg - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):465-492.
    What can rhetoric tell us about good arguments? The answer depends on what we mean by “good argument” and on how we conceive rhetoric. In this article I examine and further develop Jürgen Habermas’s argumentation theory as an answer to the question—or as I explain, an expanded version of that question. Habermas places his theory in the family of normative approaches that recognize (at least) three evaluative perspectives on all argument making: logic, dialectic, and rhetoric, which proponents loosely align with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • O conceito de "ação comunicativa fraca" na teoria de Habermas.Antonio Saturnino Braga - 2017 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 62 (1):98-115.
    O objetivo do presente artigo é analisar em que medida o conceito de ação comunicativa fraca permite que a teoria habermasiana incorpore a possibilidade não apenas de uma mistura entre orientação para o sucesso e orientação para o entendimento, mas uma mistura em que tais orientações são tomadas como aspectos contrários mas dialeticamente interdependentes de certos atos de fala. Em última instância, trata-se de avaliar em que medida esta compreensão mais dialética da relação entre as duas orientações torna a teoria (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Constitutional reason and political identity.Shane O'Neill - 2001 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (3):1-26.
    This article presents a normative‐theoretical account of democratic legitimacy that meets the challenge of moral and cultural pluralism in a way that takes the avoidance of oppression and violence to be a fundamental imperative. The discourse‐theoretical perspective of jürgen Habermas reveals that reasoned agreement among citizens is the only alternative to political oppression. Pace Habermas, however, the legitimacy of even basic constitutional principles does not require us to agree with one another for the same reasons. While we can affirm such (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Habermas’s epistemic conception of democracy: Some reactions to McCarthy’s objections.Stéphane Courtois - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (7):842-866.
    The article aims at assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the objections to Habermas’s epistemic conception of democracy raised by Thomas McCarthy in some of his essays. The author defends two ideas. First, he contends that McCarthy is mistaken in believing that democratic debates would not be a matter of consensus. In this regard, two arguments are raised, showing that the search for agreement and consensus by citizens in public forums can hardly be dismissed and that consensus can be invested (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Una apuesta Por el interculturalismo contra el multiculturalismo.María Elósegui Ltxaso - 1998 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 43 (2):303-318.
    En 1992 Charles Taylor escribiá un libra titulado Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition. Dos anos más tarde la misma editorial, Princeton University Press, publicá una reedicián. Se afiadía una leve variante en el título, la palavra examining: Multiculturalism. Examining the politics of recognition. La novedad de esta edicián fue que se afiadieran dos nuevos ensayos, uno de Jürgen Habermas, titulado Stmggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State y el otro por K. Anthony Appiah, afraamericano, con lo que se (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark