Switch to: References

Citations of:

John M. E. Mctaggart

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2010)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Quasi-supplementation, plenitudinous coincidentalism, and gunk.Cody Gilmore - forthcoming - In Robert K. Garcia (ed.), Substance: New Essays. Philosophia Verlag.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • マクタガートのA理論とB理論の成立経緯と「時間の空間化」.Tora Koyama - 2023 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 55 (2):19-34.
    McTaggart’s paradox and his A-theory and B-theory are basic notions in the contemporary philosophy of time. It is well known that the paradox was introduced by McTaggart’s paper called “The Unreality of Time” published in 1908, so that it has a one-hundred-year history. As for A-theory and B-theory, in contrast, McTaggart himself didn’t consider both of them at all. The notions of A-theory and B-theory came much later, 60 years after the paradox. Moreover, they had not been as popularized as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The obsession with time in 1880s–1930s American-British philosophy.Emily Thomas - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (2):149-160.
    ABSTRACT In American-British philosophy around the turn of the twentieth century, every philosopher and their dog had something to say on time. Thinkers worried about our experience of time, and the metaphysics of time. This introduction to the special issue, Time in American-British Philosophy 1880s-1930s, investigates that obsession, explaining how its philosophers spilled pints of ink on time, and produced the first-ever surveys of time. I historically contextualise their work and explore some of its driving causes, including experimental psychology of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Phantasie in Language Formation?: Imagination in Hegel’s “Psychology”.Mark Antony Jalalum - 2022 - Kritike 16 (1):74-95.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Contingencies within Spacetime.Baptiste Le Bihan - 2015 - Dissertation, University of Rennes 1
    I begin by giving reasons to accept the block-universe view, the strongly supported by physics view that we live in a four-dimensional world. According to it, the past and the future are as real as the present. As a result, it seems that the future is determined in the sense that what will be the case will necessarily be the case. In the dissertation, I examine whether we have to accept this consequence. I show that we do not have to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Hegel, Spinoza, and McTaggart on the Reality of Time.Yitzhak Melamed - 2016 - Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus / International Yearbook of German Idealism 14:211-234.
    In this paper, I study one aspect of the philosophical encounter between Spinoza and Hegel: the question of the reality of time. The precise reconstruction of the debate will require a close examination of Spinoza's concept of tempus (time) and duratio (duration), and Hegel's understanding of these notions. Following a presentation of Hegel's perception of Spinoza as a modern Eleatic, who denies the reality of time, change and plurality, I turn, in the second part, to look closely at Spinoza's text (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Les Hortillonnages.Gian Agbisit - 2022 - Kritike 16 (1):i-i.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • British Idealist Monadologies and the Reality of Time: Hilda Oakeley Against McTaggart, Leibniz, and Others.Emily Thomas - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6):1150-1168.
    In the early twentieth century, a rare strain of British idealism emerged which took Leibniz's Monadology as its starting point. This paper discusses a variant of that strain, offered by Hilda Oakeley. I set Oakeley's monadology in its philosophical context and discuss a key point of conflict between Oakeley and her fellow monadologists: the unreality of time. Oakeley argues that time is fundamentally real, a thesis arguably denied by Leibniz and subsequent monadologists, and by all other British idealists. This paper (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • McTaggart’s A and B Series and the Time Epistemologies of St. Augustine, Nāgārjuna, and Stephen Hawking.Jason Morgan - 2022 - Kritike 16 (1):22-40.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the significance of A. A. Robb’s philosophy of time, especially in relation to Bertrand Russell’s.Richard T. W. Arthur - 2022 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (2):251-273.
    The aim of this paper is to explain the significance of Alfred A. Robb’s philosophy of time stemming from his interpretation of relativity theory; and at the same time, to investigate the reasons for the failure of his philosophical contemporaries to appreciate its significance, with special attention to its reception on Russell’s part. The study of Russell’s reaction to Robb exposes shortcomings in Russell’s own philosophy of time, which has been extremely influential through the years. It also highlights the philosophical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Wheeling time: What is a workable concept of time from a feminist theological perspective?Mirjam Murphy - unknown
    The feminist theological literature highlights certain weaknesses in the traditional Christian understanding of eschatology, death and the concept of time. Many feminist theologians reject the linear time concept and the idea of final, fixed eschatology in which death is an enemy to be conquered and flourishing is postponed and reserved to another time and space. However, an alternative convincing vision for a concept of time in which eschatology and death have a place and meaning that is congruent with the feminist (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark