Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Construction of Issues: Pleading Theory and Practice, Relevance in Pragmatics, and the Confrontation Stage in the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. [REVIEW]Sebastian McEvoy - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):43-52.
    Legal theory and practice, particularly on the exchange of pleadings, are referred to as a means of examining current thinking in pragmatics on relevance. The rules of pleadings suggest that the concept of relevance as used in pragmatics is emptied of any meaning and that theories of argumentation have not sufficiently taken into account the preliminary construction which issues to be argued about require.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A Survey of 25 Years of Research on Legal Argumentation.E. T. Feteris - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (3):355-376.
    This essay discusses the developments and trends of research in legalargumentation of the last 25 years. The essay starts with a survey of thevarious approaches which can be distinguished: the logical approach, therhetorical approach, and the dialogical approach. Then it identifies varioustopics in the research, which constitute the various components of aresearch programme of legal argumentation: the philosophical component, thetheoretical component, the reconstruction component, the empiricalcomponent, and the practical component. It concludes with a discussion ofthe main trends in the research (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations