Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Freedom without being: Kant’s corrective as the philosophical crux of Agamben’s ‘Homo Sacer’ series.Susan D. Brophy - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (2):147488511667354.
    In Giorgio Agamben’s eyes, Immanuel Kant’s work is the modern philosophical harbinger of the catastrophic ‘state of exception’. By focusing on the latter’s ‘author/subject corrective’, I make the connection between Agamben and Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason more apparent. In doing so, I show how Kant’s corrective instrumentalises autonomy in such a way that it compromises the validity it seeks to rationalise; it does so by separating the individual from actuality, by ostracising law from political challenge, and by conflating individual (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Freedom without being: Kant’s corrective as the philosophical crux of Agamben’s ‘Homo Sacer’ series.Susan D. Brophy - 2019 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (2):195-215.
    In Giorgio Agamben’s eyes, Immanuel Kant’s work is the modern philosophical harbinger of the catastrophic ‘state of exception’. By focusing on the latter’s ‘author/subject corrective’, I make the connection between Agamben and Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason more apparent. In doing so, I show how Kant’s corrective instrumentalises autonomy in such a way that it compromises the validity it seeks to rationalise; it does so by separating the individual from actuality, by ostracising law from political challenge, and by conflating individual (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Kant-Bibliographie 2009.Margit Ruffing - 2011 - Kant Studien 102 (4):499-540.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • From voice to infancy Giorgio Agamben on the existence of language.Daniel McLoughlin - 2013 - Angelaki 18 (4):149-164.
    The main concern of Agamben's work, prior to the Homo Sacer project, is how to understand the existence of or potentiality for language. Contemporary philosophy casts language as the unsayable presupposition of discourse. Agamben criticises this as an incomplete nihilism that remains within the horizon of metaphysics, and attempts to think the experience of language without an unsayable ground. I examine Agamben's critique of the role of the ineffable in the theory of the subject, and in the thought of Heidegger (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark