Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Emerging technologies and developing countries: Stem cell research regulation and Argentina.Shawn H. E. Harmon - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (2):138-150.
    ABSTRACTGiven its intimate relationship with the human body and its environment, biotechnology innovation, and more particularly stem cell research innovations as a part thereof, implicate diverse social and moral/ethical issues. This paper explores some of the most important and controversial moral concerns raised by human embryonic stem cell research , focusing on concerns relating to the wellbeing of the embryo and the wellbeing of society . It then considers how and whether these concerns are dealt with in regulatory instruments in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas.Hugh V. McLachlan - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (8):550-551.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why current uk legislation on embryo research is immoral. How the argument from lack of qualities and the argument from potentiality have been applied and why they should be rejected.Jan Deckers - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):251–271.
    ABSTRACT On 22 January 2001, the UK became the first country to approve of embryonic stem cell research by passing the Human Fertilisation (Research Purposes) Regulations 2001, which legislated new research purposes for which early embryos can be used, in addition to those approved by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Legal advisory committees, most notably the Chief Medical Officer's Expert Group and the House of Lords’ Select Committee, have offered various reasons, which can also be found in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations