Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The case for regulating intragenic GMOs.A. Wendy Russell & Robert Sparrow - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (2):153-181.
    This paper discusses the ethical and regulatory issues raised by ‘‘intragenics’’ – organisms that have been genetically modified using gene technologies, but that do not contain DNA from another species. Considering the rapid development of knowledge about gene regulation and genomics, we anticipate rapid advances in intragenic methods. Of regulatory systems developed to govern genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, the Australian system stands out in explicitly excluding intragenics from regulation. European systems are also (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Hegemony, commodification, and the state: Mexico's shifting discourse on agricultural germplasm. [REVIEW]Francisco Martínez Gómez & Robert Torres - 2001 - Agriculture and Human Values 18 (3):285-294.
    In this work, we examine the debate over thecommodification of agricultural germplasm in Mexico using aneo-Marxist theoretical framework. Specifically, we examine Mexico's movement away from a ``Farmers' Rights'' framework, whichtreats germplasm as a ``common good'' towards the passage of theMexican Federal Law on Plant Varieties, which sees germplasm as acommodity. In order to understand this legal change, the recenthistory of this discourse in Mexico is examined. Usingtheoretical insights based in an analysis of this discourse, weexamine the ideological elements of this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation