Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How Should a Speech Recognizer Work?Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis Bosch & James M. McQueen - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Although researchers studying human speech recognition (HSR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) share a common interest in how information processing systems (human or machine) recognize spoken language, there is little communication between the two disciplines. We suggest that this lack of communication follows largely from the fact that research in these related fields has focused on the mechanics of how speech can be recognized. In Marr's (1982) terms, emphasis has been on the algorithmic and implementational levels rather than on the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Interaction in Spoken Word Recognition Models: Feedback Helps.James S. Magnuson, Daniel Mirman, Sahil Luthra, Ted Strauss & Harlan D. Harris - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Are there interactive processes in speech perception?Lori L. Holt James L. McClelland, Daniel Mirman - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (8):363.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • How Should a Speech Recognizer Work?Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis ten Bosch & James M. McQueen - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Although researchers studying human speech recognition (HSR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) share a common interest in how information processing systems (human or machine) recognize spoken language, there is little communication between the two disciplines. We suggest that this lack of communication follows largely from the fact that research in these related fields has focused on the mechanics of how speech can be recognized. In Marr's (1982) terms, emphasis has been on the algorithmic and implementational levels rather than on the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Lexically Mediated Compensation for Coarticulation Still as Elusive as a White Christmash.James M. McQueen, Alexandra Jesse & Holger Mitterer - 2023 - Cognitive Science 47 (9):e13342.
    Luthra, Peraza-Santiago, Beeson, Saltzman, Crinnion, and Magnuson (2021) present data from the lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation paradigm that they claim provides conclusive evidence in favor of top-down processing in speech perception. We argue here that this evidence does not support that conclusion. The findings are open to alternative explanations, and we give data in support of one of them (that there is an acoustic confound in the materials). Lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation thus remains elusive, while prior data from (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations