Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The information-theoretic view of quantum mechanics and the measurement problem(s).Federico Laudisa - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (2):1-26.
    Until recently Jeffrey Bub and Itamar Pitowsky, in the framework of an information-theoretic view of quantum mechanics, claimed first that to the measurement problem in its ordinary formulation there correspond in effect two measurement problems (simply called the big and the small measurement problems), with a different degree of relevance and, second, that the analysis of a quantum measurement is a problem only if other assumptions – taken by Pitowsky and Bub to be unnecessary ‘dogmas’ – are assumed. Here I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Measurements, Preparations, and Interpretations in Quantum Theory: A Comment on Meehan.Guy Hetzroni - 2024 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 75 (3):687-694.
    I address the recent debate between Meehan and Vaidman concerning the claim made by the former for a new problem to quantum mechanics. I argue that while Meehan's incompatibility claim does hold in the situation he presents, it does not genuinely involve considerations that can limit quantum state preparation, nor does it introduce new constrains over possible interpretations of quantum theory.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Clarifying the New Problem for Quantum Mechanics: Reply to Vaidman.Alexander Meehan - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (1):1-6.
    I respond to Vaidman’s recent criticisms of my paper “A New Problem for Quantum Mechanics”.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • There is No New Problem for Quantum Mechanics.Lev Vaidman - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (11):1728-1734.
    A recent claim by Meehan that quantum mechanics has a new “control problem” that puts limits on our ability to prepare quantum states and revises our understanding of the no-cloning theorem is examined. We identify flaws in Meehan’s analysis and argue that such a problem does not exist.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations