Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. MinMax fairness: from Rawlsian Theory of Justice to solution for algorithmic bias.Flavia Barsotti & Rüya Gökhan Koçer - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-14.
    This paper presents an intuitive explanation about why and how Rawlsian Theory of Justice (Rawls in A theory of justice, Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1971) provides the foundations to a solution for algorithmic bias. The contribution of the paper is to discuss and show why Rawlsian ideas in their original form (e.g. the veil of ignorance, original position, and allowing inequalities that serve the worst-off) are relevant to operationalize fairness for algorithmic decision making. The paper also explains how this leads (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • AI ageism: a critical roadmap for studying age discrimination and exclusion in digitalized societies.Justyna Stypinska - 2023 - AI and Society 38 (2):665-677.
    In the last few years, we have witnessed a surge in scholarly interest and scientific evidence of how algorithms can produce discriminatory outcomes, especially with regard to gender and race. However, the analysis of fairness and bias in AI, important for the debate of AI for social good, has paid insufficient attention to the category of age and older people. Ageing populations have been largely neglected during the turn to digitality and AI. In this article, the concept of AI ageism (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • On prediction-modelers and decision-makers: why fairness requires more than a fair prediction model.Teresa Scantamburlo, Joachim Baumann & Christoph Heitz - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-17.
    An implicit ambiguity in the field of prediction-based decision-making concerns the relation between the concepts of prediction and decision. Much of the literature in the field tends to blur the boundaries between the two concepts and often simply refers to ‘fair prediction’. In this paper, we point out that a differentiation of these concepts is helpful when trying to implement algorithmic fairness. Even if fairness properties are related to the features of the used prediction model, what is more properly called (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark