Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research Should Include Risks of Standard Care.Lois Shepherd - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3):352-364.
    This paper explains why informed consent for randomized comparative effectiveness research must include risks of standard care. Disclosures of such risks are both legally and ethically required and, for reasons discussed in the paper, should remain so.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • SUPPORT and the Ethics of Study Implementation: Lessons for Comparative Effectiveness Research from the Trial of Oxygen Therapy for Premature Babies.John D. Lantos & Chris Feudtner - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (1):30-40.
    The Surfactant, Positive Pressure, and Oxygenation Randomized Trial (SUPPORT) has been the focal point of many different criticisms regarding the ethics of the study ever since publication of the trial's findings in 2010 and 2012. In this article, we focus on a concern that the technical design and implementation details of the study were ethically flawed. While the federal Office Human Research Protections focused on the consent form, rather than on the study design and implementation, OHRP's critiques of the consent (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations