Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Apologie Pour les Faiseurs de Modèles: À propos de Guillaume Tusseau, Modelli di giustizia costituzionale. Saggio di critica metodologica—Contre les « modèles » de justice constitutionnelle. Essai de critique méthodologique, Bononia University Press, Coll. « Ricerche di Diritto Comparato », Bologna, 2009, 106 p.—87 p. pour la partie française.Jean-Baptiste Pointel - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (1):143-152.
    Dans son ouvrage Contre les « modèles » de justice constitutionnelle. Essai de critique méthodologique, Guillaume Tusseau décide de déconstruire et de combattre la traditionnelle dichotomie entre le soi-disant « modèle américain » et celui « européen » ou « kelsénien ». En effet, cette distinction est inutile voire contre-productive. Cet écrit est, pour l’auteur, l’occasion d’énoncer un projet comparatif, s’affranchissant des cadres antérieurs. Si sa démonstration est convaincante et fortement argumentée, une autre position théorique peut toutefois être embrassée. Sans (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the Importance of Questioning Within the Ideal Model of Critical Discussion.Fernando Leal - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):405-431.
    Both questions as abstract objects and the speech acts, here called requests, by which we ask them play an enormous role in all argumentative practices. Nonetheless, there is hardly a proper systematic treatment of questions and requests in current argumentation theories. This paper is a first attempt at providing such a systematic treatment. This is achieved by following the ideal model of a critical discussion as elaborated over the years by the Amsterdam school of pragma-dialectics. After introducing the distinction between (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory: Cham (CH), Springer (= Argumentation Library, 35), 2020, 289 pp.Fernando Leal - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (3):389-397.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • An application of Michel Meyer's Theory of problematology to David Hume's Diaologues concerning natural religion.James L. Golden - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (1):69-89.
    This study advances the claim that Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, which drew its inspiration and guidelines from Cicero's De Natura Deorum, fulfills four basic elements of Michel Meyer's theory of problematology. In doing so, it is argued, the Dialogues contribute importantly to our understanding of the question-answer pair, and to the notion of rhetoric as a way of knowing.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Logic or rhetoric in law?Alain Lempereur - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (3):283-297.
    One of the most crucial questions in the philosophy of law deals with the very nature of legal reasoning. Does this reasoning belong to logic or to rhetoric? This debate, increasingly centered on rhetoric, is not merely a question of language use; it covers and indicates a more basic choice between formal legalism — focusing on rational deduction from the law — and pragmatic judiciarism — focusing on reasonable debate in the court.Today, it is necessary to circumscribe the respective fields (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • «The limbs and the wheel»: about Coronation by Michel Deguy.Michela Landi - 2021 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 14 (1):7-14.
    On 13 March 2020, in the magazine Po&sie, which he founded, Deguy published a text entitled Coronation. Here, the reading of the contingent viral situation and certain concomitant events made use of his particular interpretative lens aimed at the poetic fact: the continuous exorbitance of the verbal matter from the confined space of the text, and the 'oppugnance' between its inside and outside, as a gift and its antidote. The twofold meaning of the lemma corona leads us back to the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What is a Problem?Osborne Thomas - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (4):1-17.
    By way of a selective comparison of the work of Georges Canguilhem and Henri Bergson on their respective conceptions of ‘problematology’, this article argues that the centrality of the notion of the ‘problem’ in each can be found in their differing conceptions of the philosophy of life and the living being. Canguilhem’s model, however, ultimately moves beyond or away from (legislative) philosophy and epistemology towards the question of ethics in so far as his vitalism is a means of signalling the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Adaptation to context.Charles Arthur Willard - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (1):91-107.
    Argument theorists often stress the idea of adaptation to context as an alternative to seeing argument as linked propositions. But adaptation is not a clear idea. It is in fact a complicated puzzle. Though many aspects of this puzzle are obscure, one clear conclusion is that the question-answer pair is not a good way to conceptualize adaptation to situation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation