Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A reinterpretation of Harre's copernican revolution.Edward Mackinnon - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (1):67-79.
    Rom Harré's proposed Copernican Revolution in the philosophy of science is a very ambitious undertaking. It challenges established views, proposes a radically new model for scientific explanation, and forces a rethinking of the foundations of the field. In his treatment of the natural sciences, Harré rejects all deductivist accounts of scientific explanation basically on the grounds that such accounts seriously distort the methods of explanation actually operative in science. In the social sciences Harré, in collaboration with Secord, rejects mechanistic, positivistic, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Harre and Madden's multifarious account of natural necessity.Raymond Woller - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):616-632.
    In this paper, I critically examine Harre and Madden's attempt, largely as it occurs in their Causal Powers, to secure for causes and laws of nature a kind of necessity which although consistent with commonsensical empiricism and anti-idealistic philosophy of science nevertheless runs counter to the humean-positivistic tradition, which denies the existence of any distinctively "natural" or causal necessity. In the course of the paper, I reveal the multifarious nature of their account and show that each part of that account, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A reply to Frankel's criticism of Harre's theory of causality.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (2):282-289.
    Frankel has argued that the theory of causality developed by Rom Harré and his colleague Edward Madden is incoherent, since the proposal that causal claims are naturally necessary leads to a vicious infinite regression“which ends by requiring that for any causal claim to be accorded the status of natural necessity an infinite number of causal claims must be accorded the status of natural necessities.”.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations