Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Public health nudges: weighing individual liberty and population health benefits.Derek Soled - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (11):756-760.
    Libertarian paternalism describes the idea of nudging—that is, steering individual decision-making while preserving freedom of choice. In medicine, libertarian paternalism has gained widespread attention, specifically with respect to interventions designed to promote healthy behaviours. Some scholars argue that nudges appropriately balance autonomy and paternalistic beneficence, while others argue that nudges inherently exploit cognitive weaknesses. This paper further explores the ethics of libertarian paternalism in public health. The use of nudges may infringe on an individual’s voluntary choice, autonomy and informed consent, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Nudging in the clinic: the ethical implications of differences in doctors’ and patients’ point of view.David Avitzour & Ittay Nissan-Rozen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (3):183-189.
    There is an extensive ethical debate regarding the justifiability of doctors nudging towards healthy behaviour and better health-related choices. One line of argument in favour of nudging is based on empirical findings, according to which a healthy majority among the public support nudges. In this paper, we show, based on an experiment we conducted, that, in health-related choices, people’s ethical attitudes to nudging are strongly affected by the point of view from which the nudge is considered. Significant differences have been (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Nudging in Context: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Nudging and Informed Consent”.Shlomo Cohen - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):W1 - W6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Framing effects from misleading implicatures: an empirically based case against some purported nudges.Shang Long Yeo - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
    Some bioethicists argue that a doctor may frame treatment options in terms of effects on survival rather than on mortality in order to influence patients to choose the better option. The debate over such framing typically assumes that the survival and mortality frames convey the same numerical information. However, certain empirical findings contest this numerical equivalence assumption, demonstrating that framing effects may in fact be due to the two frames implying different information about the numerical bounds of survival and mortality (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Ethics of Workplace Health Promotion.Eva Kuhn, Sebastian Müller, Ludger Heidbrink & Alena Buyx - 2020 - Public Health Ethics 13 (3):234-246.
    Companies increasingly offer their employees the opportunity to participate in voluntary Workplace Health Promotion programmes. Although such programmes have come into focus through national and regional regulation throughout much of the Western world, their ethical implications remain largely unexamined. This article maps the territory of the ethical issues that have arisen in relation to voluntary health promotion in the workplace against the background of asymmetric relationships between employers and employees. It addresses questions of autonomy and voluntariness, discrimination and distributive justice, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Autonomy Means Having to Make a Choice.Michael Shapiro & Frances Ward - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (11):19-20.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Republican Argument Against Nudging and Informed Consent.Paul Hamilton - 2018 - HEC Forum 30 (3):267-282.
    I argue that it is impermissible to use nudges as a tool to influence patients in the context of informed consent. The motivation for such nudges is that their use can help reconcile potential conflicts between a physician’s duty of beneficence and duty to respect patient autonomy. I argue that their use places physicians in a position of domination over patients. That is, it violates the republican freedom of patients because it grants physicians the power to arbitrarily interfere. I also (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Rights, Nudging, and the Good of Others.Luke Gelinas - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (11):17-19.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Ethical Transhumanism: How can a nudge approach to public health make human enhancement more ethical?Alexandra Jane Robinson - 2021 - Dissertation, University of Kent
    Transhumanism at once embodies our most modern thinking and our biggest longstanding problems. Transhumanism aims to enhance human core capacities: health-span, lifespan, and cognition. The thesis answers the following ethical challenges arising from transhumanist aims. First, whether transhumanism can be an ethical endeavour if it relies on authoritarian intervention by governments and governing bodies to change, generate and enforce behaviour, or to influence and enforce the uptake of medical procedures. Second, the thesis answers the challenge that it is unethical deliberately (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Ethical Merits of Nudges in the Clinical Setting.Ester Moher & Khaled El Emam - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (10):54-55.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation