Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The demanding community: Politicization of the individual after Dewey.Matthew C. Flamm - 2006 - Education and Culture 22 (1):35-54.
    : This article argues that conceptions of community after Dewey despair of an institutional means of recovering individuality, which is the central problem of democracy. They so despair, I contend, because of their politicized view of the individual. I first briefly consider the contrast between Dewey and contemporary proceduralists and civic republicans, before turning to my central discussion: C. Wright Mills, whose critique indicates a historical watershed for Dewey's view of community. Ultimately, despair of a Deweyan sense of community issues (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Towards a more pragmatic sociology of markets.Christine Overdevest - 2011 - Theory and Society 40 (5):533-552.
    A satisfactory sociology of markets requires that both order and disorder in markets be addressed, yet sociologists have seemed more concerned with theorizing market stability and order. Change, however, is too fundamental a part of markets to receive so little sociological attention. One perspective that provides a fertile ground for moving ahead with developing an agenda for studying both stability and change in markets is American pragmatist social theory. This article therefore examines the influence of a pragmatist viewpoint on two (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Roots of “Radical Interactionism”.Lonnie Athens - 2009 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (4):387-414.
    A plea has been made for replacing the perspective of “symbolic interactionism” with a new interactionist's perspective—“radical interactionism.” Unlike in symbolic interactionism, where Mead's and Blumer's ideas play the most prominent roles, in radical interactionism's, Park's ideas play a more prominent role than either Mead's or Blumer's ideas. On the one hand, according to Mead, the general principle behind the organization of human group life was once dominance, but it is now “sociality.” On the other hand, according to Park, this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The powers and capabilities of selves: Social and collective approaches.Guy E. Swanson - 1985 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 15 (3):331–354.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations