Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hans Reichenbach’s Debt to David Hilbert and Bertrand Russell.Nikolay Milkov - forthcoming - In Elena Ficara, Andrea Reichenberger & Anna-Sophie Heinemann, Rethinking the History of Logic, Mathematics, and Exact Sciences. Rickmansworth (Herts): College Publications. pp. 259-285.
    Despite of the fact that Reichenbach clearly acknowledged his indebtedness to Hilbert, the influence of this leading mathematician of the time on him is grossly neglected. The present paper demonstrates that the decisive years of the development of Reichenbach as a philosopher of science coincide with, and also partly followed the “philosophical” turn of Hilbert’s mathematics after 1917 that was fixed in the so called “Hilbert’s program”. The paper specifically addresses the fact that after 1917, Hilbert saw the axiomatic method (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Russell and Husserl (1905–1918): The Not-So-Odd Couple.Nikolay Milkov - 2017 - In Peter Stone, Bertrand Russell’s Life and Legacy. Wilmington, Delaware, United States: Vernon Press. pp. 73-96.
    Historians of philosophy commonly regard as antipodal Bertrand Russell and Edmund Husserl, the founding fathers of analytic philosophy and phenomenology. This paper, however, establishes that during a formative phase in both of their careers Russell and Husserl shared a range of seminal ideas. In particular, the essay adduces clear cases of family resemblance between Husserl’s and Russell’s philosophy during their middle period, which spanned the years 1905 through 1918. The paper thus challenges the received view of Husserl’s relation to early (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation