Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Does Language Matter? Exploring Chinese–Korean Differences in Holistic Perception.Ann K. Rhode, Benjamin G. Voyer & Ilka H. Gleibs - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7:214629.
    Cross-cultural research suggests that East Asians display a holistic attentional bias by paying attention to the entire field and to relationships between objects, whereas Westerners pay attention primarily to salient objects, displaying an analytic attentional bias. The assumption of a universal pan-Asian holistic attentional bias has recently been challenged in experimental research involving Japanese and Chinese participants, which suggests that linguistic factors may contribute to the formation of East Asians' holistic attentional patterns. The present experimental research explores differences in attention (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Analysis of the Semantic Scope of Two Korean Terms Equivalent to English Court.Emilia Wojtasik-Dziekan - 2020 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 33 (3):657-671.
    The article aims to analyze the semantic fields of two Korean terms in the field of a specialized judicial terminology, i.e. court and tribunal, which are usually reflected in English by one hypernym term court. This analysis, although carried out on limited Korean data, is intended to indicate the differences between the use of these two different Korean terms and to indicate the reasons why court is currently the most common English equivalent. At the same time, the author, by pointing (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality.Jungmee Lee - 2013 - Natural Language Semantics 21 (1):1-41.
    This paper explores how the meaning of evidentiality is temporally constrained, by investigating the meaning of Korean evidential sentences with –te. Unlike evidential sentences in languages that have previously been formally analyzed , e.g. Cuzco Quechua and Cheyenne, Korean evidential sentences with –te are compatible with both direct and indirect evidence types. In this paper, I analyze –te as an evidential that lexically encodes the meaning of a ‘sensory observation’. I account for the availability of both direct and indirect evidential (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations