- (1 other version)Entering the Social Experiment: A Case for the Informed Consent of Graduate Engineering Students.Michael Lightner & Erik Fisher - 2009 - Social Epistemology 23 (3):283-300.details
|
|
Avoiding empty rhetoric: Engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Conceptualization of RRI: An Iterative Approach.P. Klaassen - 2017 - In L. Asveld, R. Van Dam-Mieras, T. Swierstra, S. Lavrijssen, K. Linse & J. Van Den Hoven (eds.), Responsible Innovation. Springer International Publishing.details
|
|
With great power comes great responsibility: why ‘safe enough’ is not good enough in debates on new gene technologies.Sigfrid Kjeldaas, Tim Dassler, Trine Antonsen, Odd-Gunnar Wikmark & Anne I. Myhr - 2022 - Agriculture and Human Values 40 (2):533-545.details
|
|
Hype After Hype: From Bio to Nano to AI.Franz Seifert & Camilo Fautz - 2021 - NanoEthics 15 (2):143-148.details
|
|
“What Is the FDA Going to Think?”: Negotiating Values through Reflective and Strategic Category Work in Microbiome Science.Pamela L. Sankar, Mildred K. Cho, Angie M. Boyce & Katherine W. Darling - 2015 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 40 (1):71-95.details
|
|
Three philosophical perspectives on the relation between technology and society, and how they affect the current debate about artificial intelligence.Ibo van de Poel - 2020 - Human Affairs 30 (4):499-511.details
|
|
Art-Science Collaboration in an EPSRC/BBSRC-Funded Synthetic Biology UK Research Centre.Michael Reinsborough - 2020 - NanoEthics 14 (1):93-111.details
|
|
Responsible Research? Dilemmata der Integration gesellschaftlicher und kultureller Perspektiven in naturwissenschaftliche Forschungsprogramme (Einleitung).Cornelius Borck, Veronika Lipphardt, Sabine Maasen, Ruth Müller & Michael Penkler - 2018 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 41 (3):215-221.details
|
|
Nanotechnology Development as if People and Places Matter.Rider Foley, Arnim Wiek & Braden Kay - 2017 - NanoEthics 11 (3):243-257.details
|
|
Governing in the Context of Uncertainty.Jane Calvert - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (S5):31-33.details
|
|
Specificity and Engagement: Increasing ELSI’s Relevance to Nano–Scientists.Barry L. Shumpert, Amy K. Wolfe, David J. Bjornstad, Stephanie Wang & Maria Fernanda Campa - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (2):193-200.details
|
|
Engagement Agents in the Making: On the Front Lines of Socio-Technical Integration: Commentary on: “Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies”.Shannon N. Conley - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):715-721.details
|
|
Green dreams of reason. Green nanotechnology between visions of excess and control.Astrid E. Schwarz - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (2):109-118.details
|
|
From Value Sensitive Design to values absorption – building an instrument to analyze organizational capabilities for value-sensitive innovation.Jilde Garst & Vincent Blok - 2022 - Journal of Responsible Innovation 1.details
|
|
Toward a Value-Sensitive Absorptive Capacity Framework: Navigating Intervalue and Intravalue Conflicts to Answer the Societal Call for Health.Onno S. W. F. Omta, Léon Jansen, Oana Branzei, Vincent Blok & Jilde Garst - 2021 - Business and Society 60 (6):1349-1386.details
|
|
Responsibility in Engineering: Toward a New Role for Engineering Ethicists.Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist & Neelke Doorn - 2010 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 30 (3):222-230.details
|
|
Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize.Shannon L. Spruit, Gordon D. Hoople & David A. Rolfe - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):871-887.details
|
|
The Walkshop Approach to Science and Technology Ethics.Fern Wickson, Roger Strand & Kamilla Lein Kjølberg - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):241-264.details
|
|
The Why and How of Enabling the Integration of Social and Ethical Aspects in Research and Development.Steven M. Flipse, Maarten Ca van der Sanden & Patricia Osseweijer - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):703-725.details
|
|
Lose One Another... and Find One Another in Nanospace. ‘Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow’s Society: A Case for Reflective Action Research in Flanders ’. [REVIEW]Lieve Goorden, Michiel Van Oudheusden, Johan Evers & Marian Deblonde - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (3):213-230.details
|
|
Creative Anticipatory Ethical Reasoning with Scenario Analysis and Design Fiction.Emily York & Shannon N. Conley - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):2985-3016.details
|
|
Lab Work Goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes: Commentary on: “What Happens in the Lab Does Not Stay in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory”.Brian Wynne - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):791-800.details
|
|
Standardising Responsibility? The Significance of Interstitial Spaces.Fern Wickson & Ellen-Marie Forsberg - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1159-1180.details
|
|
Integrating and Enacting 'Social and Ethical Issues' in Nanotechnology Practices.Ana Viseu & Heather Maguire - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (3):195-209.details
|
|
Taking the “Soft Impacts” of Technology into Account: Broadening the Discourse in Research Practice.Simone van der Burg - 2009 - Social Epistemology 23 (3):301-316.details
|
|
Responsible Research Is Not Good Science: Divergences Inhibiting the Enactment of RRI in Nanosafety.Lilian van Hove & Fern Wickson - 2017 - NanoEthics 11 (3):213-228.details
|
|
Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies.Haico te Kulve & Arie Rip - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):699-714.details
|
|
Rawls’s Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Method for Engaged Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Potentials and Limitations for the Context of Technological Risks.Behnam Taebi & Neelke Doorn - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (3):487-517.details
|
|
Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance.Sarah Hartley & Carmen McLeod - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (4):723-741.details
|
|
Testing Reflexive Practitioner Dialogues: Capacities for Socio-technical Integration in Meditation Research.Mareike Smolka & Erik Fisher - 2024 - NanoEthics 18 (1):1-26.details
|
|
Field Philosophy East and West: An Introduction to the Special Issue.Adam Briggle - 2020 - Social Epistemology 35 (4):337-344.details
|
|
What happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory. [REVIEW]Daan Schuurbiers - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):769-788.details
|
|
Why is integration so difficult? Shifting roles of ethics and three idioms for thinking about science, technology and society.Rune Nydal - 2015 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):21-36.details
|
|
Why Should Nanoscience Students be Taught to be Ethically Competent?Anna Julie Rasmussen & Mette Ebbesen - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4):1065-1077.details
|
|
A Vision for Empirical ELSI along the R&D Pipeline.Ramya M. Rajagopalan, Julie Cakici & Cinnamon S. Bloss - 2024 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 15 (2):81-86.details
|
|
Who ought to look towards the horizon? A qualitative study on the collective social responsibility of scientific research.Vincenzo Politi - 2024 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 14 (2):1-26.details
|
|
The citizen goes shopping : a framework for the assessment and optimization of production from the perspective of society.Tassos Michalopoulos - unknowndetails
|
|
Responsible Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Contextualizing Socio-Technical Integration into the Nanofabrication Laboratories in the USA. [REVIEW]Debasmita Patra - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (2):143-157.details
|
|
Integrating Value Considerations in the Decision Making for the Design of Biorefineries.Mar Palmeros Parada, Lotte Asveld, Patricia Osseweijer & John Alexander Posada - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):2927-2955.details
|
|
God nanoetikk – god nanoteknologiutvikling.Rune Nydal & Roger Strand - 2008 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 2 (2):33-51.details
|
|
How to Address the Policy and Ethical Issues Emerging with New Technology. The Case of Synthetic Biology in a Small Country.Franc Mali - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (1):61-73.details
|
|
Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies. [REVIEW]Federica Lucivero, Tsjalling Swierstra & Marianne Boenink - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (2):129-141.details
|
|
Responsible research and innovation in practice an exploratory assessment of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in a Nanomedicine Project.Zenlin Kwee, Emad Yaghmaei & Steven Flipse - 2021 - Journal of Responsible Technology 5:100008.details
|
|
Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry - The Case for Corporate Responsibility Tools.Konstantinos Iatridis & Doris Schroeder - 2015 - Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Edited by Doris Schroeder.details
|
|
Toward a Method for Exposing and Elucidating Ethical Issues with Human Cognitive Enhancement Technologies.Bjørn Hofmann - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2):413-429.details
|
|
Midstream Modulation in Biotechnology Industry: Redefining What is 'Part of the Job' of Researchers in Industry. [REVIEW]Steven M. Flipse, Maarten C. A. Sanden & Patricia Osseweijer - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1141-1164.details
|
|
RRI and Patenting: a Study of European Patent Governance.Ellen-Marie Forsberg & Nico Groenendijk - 2019 - NanoEthics 13 (2):83-101.details
|
|
Integration needs in assessments of nanotechnology in food and agriculture.Ellen-Marie Forsberg & Carolien De Lauwere - 2013 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):38-54.details
|
|
Institutionalising ELSA in the moment of breakdown?Ellen-Marie Forsberg - 2014 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (1):1-16.details
|
|