Central issues in philosophy of architecture include foundational matters regarding the nature of: (1) architecture as an artform, design medium, or other product or practice; (2) architectural objects—what sorts of things they are; how they differ from other sorts of objects; and how we define the range of such objects; (3) special architectural properties, like the standard trio of structural integrity (firmitas), beauty, and utility—or space, light, and form; and ways they might be special to architecture; (4) architectural types—how to (...) consider abstract groups of architectural objects and their instances; (5) meaning and other language-like phenomena in architecture and its objects; (6) formation of and warrant for our basic grasp, and considered judgment, of architectural objects; and (7) social and moral features of architectural objects and architectural practice. Yet other questions engage applied philosophical concerns regarding architecture, such as the character of architectural notation; intellectual property rights; and client-architect obligations. A far-reaching philosophy of architecture extends beyond even a broadly aesthetics-based assessment, to include considerations of ethics, social and political philosophy, and philosophical reflections on psychology and the behavioral sciences. The aesthetics of architecture, by itself, spans traditional issues mooted in philosophy of art, as well as aesthetics of the everyday, and environmental aesthetics. Such traditional issues include the nature of the work; the possibility of classes, kinds, or types in the domain; the character and roles of representation, intentionality, and expression; and the warranted foundations for criticism. The ethics of architecture also addresses traditional issues, including delineation of rights, responsibilities, the good, virtues, and justice in architectural milieus. Still other aspects of philosophy of architecture concern social and technological characteristics. (shrink)

The Norwegian historian Christian Norberg-Schulz (1926-2000) is held responsible, in general, for introducing phenomenological methods and concepts into the field of architecture theory, criticism and history. This article examines his legacy and his writings by focusing on one text on the Pyramide-Le-Perthus, built in France in 1976 by the Spanish architect Ricardo Bofill. In an exemplary way, this text shows how Norberg-Schulz used phenomenology not to ‘experience’contemporary architecture, but rather to protect it from the problems of the modern world. Norberg-Schulz (...) wrote that architecture should “tell us what being in the world implies,” but the world he constructed by means of a phenomenological reading of architecture, proves to be very narrow and almost absurd. (shrink)

Im vorliegenden Aufsatz wird der Versuch unternommen, die Kantische Philosophie insbesondere hinsichtlich ihrer Kritik der Konstruktion und die Bestimmung unterschiedlicherer Dimensionen der Wahrnehmung und des Denkens auf das architektonische Entwerfen anzuwenden. Der Aufsatz ist in drei Schritte unterteilt: im ersten wird eine Methode entfaltet, die es erlaubt, mithilfe einiger Aspekte der Philosophie Kants Gestaltungsfragen innerhalb des architektonischen Entwurfs zu untersuchen. Der zweite geht den Bezügen von Architekten und Designern wie Oswald Mathias Ungers, Otl Aicher und Lars Spuybroek auf die Philosophie (...) Kants nach, um ihre Funktion in Gestaltungsprozessen hervorzuheben. Im dritten Teil werden einige Aspekte der Schematismusund Konstruktionslehre Kants untersucht, um die Möglichkeitsräume des architektonischen Entwurfs und die Bedeutung einer transzendentalen Philosophie der Architektur aufzuzeigen. (shrink)