Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Management, Science and Reality: A Commentary on ‘Practically Useless? Why Management Theory Needs Popper’.Michael Loughlin - 2004 - Philosophy of Management 4 (2):35-44.
    Moss is right to state that management theory needs to address its epistemological foundations by considering questions in epistemology and the philosophy of science. Whether management theory needs Popper is a more tricky question. It is not clear that all theories should be falsifiable in Popper’s terms. His proposed methodology for social scientific research is inherently conservative and threatens to inhibit intellectual and social progress. But Popper’s philosophical realism and rationalism need to be preserved. Coherentism and associated forms of anti-rationalism (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Philosophy, ethics, medicine and health care: the urgent need for critical practice.Michael Loughlin, Ross E. G. Upshur, Maya J. Goldenberg, Robyn Bluhm & Kirstin Borgerson - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):249-259.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • The assumptions of ethical rationing: An unreasonable man’s response to Magelssen et al.Michael Loughlin - 2017 - Clinical Ethics 12 (2):63-69.
    Contributors to the debate on ethical rationing bring with them assumptions about the proper role of moral theories in practical discourse, which seem reasonable, realistic and pragmatic. These assumptions function to define the remit of bioethical discourse and to determine conceptions of proper methodology and causal reasoning in the area. However well intentioned, the desire to be realistic in this sense may lead us to judge the adequacy of a theory precisely with reference to its ability to deliver apparently determinate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Mapping the territory of person-centred care: ordinary language and philosophical methodology.Michael Loughlin - unknown
    Fulford’s chapter discusses the conceptual challenges facing person-centred care and the role of philosophy in addressing these challenges. He is right that this role - to investigate underlying meanings and reveal assumptions - need not and should not be restricted to the search for definitions of key terminology. The methods of “ordinary language philosophy” enable us to understand the meanings of terms by systematically examining their use in context, with a view to mapping a term's “logical geography”. He makes effective (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Virtue, Progress and Practice.Michael Loughlin, Robyn Bluhm, Stephen Buetow, Ross E. G. Upshur, Maya J. Goldenberg, Kirstin Borgerson & Vikki Entwistle - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):839-846.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Camouflage is still no defence – another plea for a straight answer to the question 'what is bioethics?'.Michael Loughlin - 2004 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 10 (1):75-83.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Critical thinking vs. moral expertise: a commentary on 'The rationale of value‐laden medicine' (Kottow 2002; Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8, 77–84). [REVIEW]Michael Loughlin - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (1):92-94.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations