Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Complexity, diversity and the role of the public sphere on the Internet.Nathan Eckstrand - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (8):961-984.
    This article explores the relationship between deliberative democracy, the Internet, and systems theory’s thoughts on diversity. After introducing Habermas’s theory of deliberative democracy and how diversity fits into it, the article discusses various ideas about whether and how it could work on the Internet. Next, the article looks at research into diversity done in the field of complex adaptive systems, showing that diversity has both good and bad effects, but is clearly preferred for the purpose of survival. The article concludes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ignorance: Passive, Active, or Virtuous.Karl W. Schweizer - 2022 - The European Legacy 28 (2):186-190.
    This timely work provides the fullest account to date of “agnotology”—the study of ignorance—and how much of this ignorance is produced by science whether intended or unintended.1 Whether it be glo...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Citizenship from the Couch: Public Engagement and Private Norms in the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond.Christine Hobden & Heidi Matisonn - 2022 - Philosophical Papers 50 (3):407-434.
    The tension between the public and the private spheres is not new: while feminists have long called for public protection to be extended to the private sphere, liberals argue for the...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Towards an Epistemic Compass for Online Content Moderation.Abraham Tobi - 2024 - Philosophy and Technology 37 (3):1-20.
    The internet provides easy access to a wealth of information that can sometimes be false and harmful. This is most apparent on social media platforms. To combat this, platforms have implemented various methods of content moderation to flag or block content that is inaccurate or violates community standards. This approach has limitations – from the epistemic injustices that might occur due to content moderation practices to the concerns about the legitimacy of these for-profit platforms’ epistemic authority. In this paper, I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark