We show the non-arithmeticity of 1st order theories of lattices of Σ n sentences modulo provable equivalence in a formal theory, of diagonalizable algebras of a wider class of arithmetic theories than has been previously known, and of the lattice of degrees of interpretability over PA. The first two results are applications of Nies’ theorem on the non-arithmeticity of the 1st order theory of the lattice of r.e. ideals on any effectively dense r.e. Boolean algebra. The theorem on degrees of (...) interpretability relies on an adaptation of techniques leading to Nies’ theorem. (shrink)

Computably enumerable equivalence relations received a lot of attention in the literature. The standard tool to classify ceers is provided by the computable reducibility \. This gives rise to a rich degree structure. In this paper, we lift the study of c-degrees to the \ case. In doing so, we rely on the Ershov hierarchy. For any notation a for a non-zero computable ordinal, we prove several algebraic properties of the degree structure induced by \ on the \ equivalence relations. (...) A special focus of our work is on the existence of infima and suprema of c-degrees. (shrink)

We show that if A and $\widehat{A}$ are automorphic via Φ then the structures $S_{R}(A)$ and $S_{R}(\widehat{A})$ are $\Delta_{3}^{0}-isomorphic$ via an isomorphism Ψ induced by Φ. Then we use this result to classify completely the orbits of hhsimple sets.

We study effectively inseparable (abbreviated as e.i.) prelattices (i.e., structures of the form$L = \langle \omega, \wedge, \vee,0,1,{ \le _L}\rangle$whereωdenotes the set of natural numbers and the following four conditions hold: (1)$\wedge, \vee$are binary computable operations; (2)${ \le _L}$is a computably enumerable preordering relation, with$0{ \le _L}x{ \le _L}1$for everyx; (3) the equivalence relation${ \equiv _L}$originated by${ \le _L}$is a congruence onLsuch that the corresponding quotient structure is a nontrivial bounded lattice; (4) the${ \equiv _L}$-equivalence classes of 0 and 1 (...) form an effectively inseparable pair of sets). Solving a problem in (Montagna & Sorbi, 1985) we show (Theorem 4.2), that ifLis an e.i. prelattice then${ \le _L}$is universal with respect to all c.e. preordering relations, i.e., for every c.e. preordering relationRthere exists a computable functionfreducingRto${ \le _L}$, i.e.,$xRy$if and only if$f\left( x \right){ \le _L}f\left( y \right)$, for all$x,y$. In fact (Corollary 5.3)${ \le _L}$is locally universal, i.e., for every pair$a{ < _L}b$and every c.e. preordering relationRone can find a reducing functionffromRto${ \le _L}$such that the range offis contained in the interval$\left\{ {x:a{ \le _L}x{ \le _L}b} \right\}$. Also (Theorem 5.7)${ \le _L}$is uniformly dense, i.e., there exists a computable functionfsuch that for every$a,b$if$a{ < _L}b$then$a{ < _L}f\left( {a,b} \right){ < _L}b$, and if$a{ \equiv _L}a\prime$and$b{ \equiv _L}b\prime$then$f\left( {a,b} \right){ \equiv _L}f\left( {a\prime,b\prime } \right)$. Some consequences and applications of these results are discussed: in particular (Corollary 7.2) for$n \ge 1$the c.e. preordering relation on${{\rm{\Sigma }}_n}$sentences yielded by the relation of provable implication of any c.e. consistent extension of Robinson’s systemRorQis locally universal and uniformly dense; and (Corollary 7.3) the c.e. preordering relation yielded by provable implication of any c.e. consistent extension of Heyting Arithmetic is locally universal and uniformly dense. (shrink)

This note addresses the issue as to which ceers can be realized by word problems of computably enumerable (or, simply, c.e.) structures (such as c.e. semigroups, groups, and rings), where being realized means to fall in the same reducibility degree (under the notion of reducibility for equivalence relations usually called “computable reducibility”), or in the same isomorphism type (with the isomorphism induced by a computable function), or in the same strong isomorphism type (with the isomorphism induced by a computable permutation (...) of the natural numbers). We observe, e.g., that every ceer is isomorphic to the word problem of some c.e. semigroup, but (answering a question of Gao and Gerdes) not every ceer is in the same reducibility degree of the word problem of some finitely presented semigroup, nor is it in the same reducibility degree of some non‐periodic semigroup. We also show that the ceer provided by provable equivalence of Peano Arithmetic is in the same strong isomorphism type as the word problem of some non‐commutative and non‐Boolean c.e. ring. (shrink)