Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The concept of Datenherrschaft of patient information from a Heideggerian perspective.Jani Simo Sakari Koskinen - 2019 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17 (3):336-353.
    PurposeIn this paper, patient information is approached from a Heideggerian perspective with the intention to gather an understanding about the personal nature of the information. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the ownership of patient information and then present Datenherrschaft as a suitable model for patient ownership of patient information.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is theoretical in approach. It is based on arguments derived from Heidegger’s work in the Being and Time.FindingsBased on this Heideggerian approcah, a proposal for using the special (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Biocircularities: New Formations of Embodied Time.Karen Jent & Branwyn Poleykett - 2023 - Body and Society 29 (2):3-19.
    In this introduction to the special section ‘Biocircularities: New Formations of Embodied Time’, we introduce the concept of ‘biocircularity’. Drawing on case studies from Senegal, Australia and the United States, we argue that (bio)circularities provides a new tool to understand transformations of embodiment and embodied time in response to rapid technoscientific, social and environmental change. We situate the potential of biocircularity by distinguishing the approach from cycles and ‘looping’. We lay out why we think biocircularity is an important concept now, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Illness perception, time perception and phenomenology – an extended response to Borrett.Tania L. Gergel - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):501-508.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Heidegger, Gestell and rehabilitation of the biomedical model.Donald S. Borrett - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (3):497-500.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations