Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Democracy as compromise: An alternative to the agonistic vs. epistemic divide.Gustavo H. Dalaqua - 2019 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 60 (144):587-607.
    The agonistic vs. epistemic dichotomy is fairly widespread in contemporary democratic theory and is endorsed by scholars as outstanding as Luis Felipe Miguel, Chantal Mouffe, and Nadia Urbinati. According to them, the idea that democratic deliberation can work as a rational exchange of arguments that aims at truth is incompatible with the recognition of conflict as a central feature of politics. In other words, the epistemic approach is bound to obliterate the agonistic and conflictive dimension of democracy. This article takes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (2 other versions)Generic Features of Evolution and Its Continuity: A Transdisciplinary Perspective.Ulrich Witt - 2010 - Theoria 18 (3):274-288.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Generic features of evolution and its continuity: A transdisciplinary perspective.Ulrich Witt - 2003 - Theoria 18 (3):273-288.
    Because of the intellectual attraction of the neo-Darwinian theory of evolution, its conccpts are often borrowed to conceptualized evolutionary change also in non-biological domains. However, a heuristic strategy like that is problematic. An attempt is therefore made to identify generic features of evolution which transcend domain-specific characteristics. Epistemological, conccptual, and methodological implications are discussed, and the ontological question is raised how non-biological evolutionary theories can be accommodated within the Darwinian world view of modern sciences.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations