Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Is logicist cognitive science possible?Alan Garnham - 1993 - Mind and Language 8 (1):49-71.
    This paper argues against Oaksford and Chater's claim that logicist cognitive science is not possible. It suggests that there arguments against logicist cognitive science are too closely tied to the account of Pylyshyn and of Fodor, and that the correct way of thinking about logicist cognitive science is in a mental models framework.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   80 citations  
  • Answer set programming and plan generation.Vladimir Lifschitz - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence 138 (1-2):39-54.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • 仮説推論に対する3種の近似解法.岡峰 正 越野 亮 - 2001 - Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 16:465-472.
    Cost-based abduction, which is a technique for identifying the best explanation for a given observation based on the assumption of a set of hypothesis, is a useful knowledge processing framework for practical problems such as diagnosis, design and planning. However, the speed of reasoning of this approach is often slow. To overcome this problem, Kato et al. previously presented a more efficient cost-based abduction system, that utilized the A * search technique, however, the time and space complexities in this technique (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Nonmonotonic reasoning in the framework of situation calculus.Andrew B. Baker - 1991 - Artificial Intelligence 49 (1-3):5-23.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations