Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Respecting Profoundly Disabled Learners.John Vorhaus - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (3):313-328.
    The goal of inclusion is more or less credible depending in part on what it is that learners have in common. I discuss one characteristic that all learners are thought to share, although the learners I am concerned with represent an awkward case for the aspiration of inclusivity. Respect is thought of as something owed to all persons, and I defend the view that this includes persons with profound and multiple learning difficulties and disabilities. I also consider the implications of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Respecting profoundly disabled learners.John Vorhaus - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (3):313–328.
    The goal of inclusion is more or less credible depending in part on what it is that learners have in common. I discuss one characteristic that all learners are thought to share, although the learners I am concerned with represent an awkward case for the aspiration of inclusivity. Respect is thought of as something owed to all persons, and I defend the view that this includes persons with profound and multiple learning difficulties and disabilities. I also consider the implications of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Personalised Learning: Ambiguities in Theory and Practice.R. J. Campbell, W. Robinson, J. Neelands, R. Hewston & L. Mazzoli - 2007 - British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (2):135-154.
    This paper traces the origins of the concept of personalisation in public sector services, and applies it to school education. The original conceptualisation stressed the need for 'deep' rather than shallow, personalisation, if radical transformation of services were to be achieved. It is argued that as the concept has been disseminated and implemented through policy documents, notably the 2005 White Paper, it has lost its original emphasis on deep personalisation. The focus in this article is particularly upon gifted and talented (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations