Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why Medicine Needs a Theology of Monstrosity.Devan Stahl - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (5):612-624.
    For centuries, philosophers and theologians debated the meaning of monstrous births. This article describes the debates that took place in the early modern period concerning the origins of monstrous births and examines how they might be relevant to our understanding of disability today. I begin with the central questions that accompanied the birth of conjoined twins in the early 17th century as well as the theological origins of those questions. I then show the shifts that occurred in philosophical debate in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Libertarianism for Conjoined Twins: A Reply to Wollen.Paweł Nowakowski, Norbert Slenzok & Stanisław Wójtowicz - forthcoming - Philosophia:1-17.
    Wollen (Libertarianism and conjoined twins) argues that libertarianism premised on absolute property rights founders where physical boundaries between two persons cannot be discerned, as is the case with conjoined twins. In this rejoinder, we make a three-pronged argument against Wollen’s claim. First, it is demonstrated that even if conjoined twins really do not hold self-ownership rights against one another, they still have one bodily ownership right against the rest of the world. Second, two alternative resolutions of Wollen’s hypothetical dispute between (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Separation of Craniopagus Twins.Reuben Johnson & Philip Weir - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (1):38-49.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience.Lisa Campo-Engelstein & Elise Andaya - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (9):634-639.
    The antiabortion movement is increasingly using ostensibly scientific measurements such as ‘fetal heartbeat’ and ‘fetal pain’ to provide ‘objective’ evidence of the moral status of fetuses. However, there is little knowledge on how clinicians conceptualise and operationalise the moral status of fetuses. We interviewed obstetrician/gynaecologists and neonatologists on this topic since their practice regularly includes clinical management of entities of the same gestational age. Contrary to our expectations, there was consensus among clinicians about conceptions of moral status regardless of specialty. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark