Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Associations Between the Legalization and Implementation of Medical Aid in Dying and Suicide Rates in the United States.Olivia P. Sutton & Brent M. Kious - forthcoming - AJOB Empirical Bioethics.
    Background Some have hypothesized that changing attitudes toward medical aid in dying (MAID) contribute to increased suicide rates, perhaps by increasing interest in dying or the perceived acceptability of suicide. This would represent a strong criticism of MAID policies. We sought to evaluate the association between the legalization and implementation of MAID across the U.S. and changing suicide rates.Methods We evaluated state-level monthly suicide death rates from 1995 to 2021. Because suicide rates vary by state, we constructed geographically-weighted regression models (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • ‘Assisted dying’ as a comforting heteronomy: the rejection of self-administration in the purported act of self-determination.David Albert Jones - 2024 - The New Bioethics 30 (2):103-122.
    Abstract‘Assisted dying’ (an umbrella term for euthanasia and/or assisted suicide) is frequently defended as an act of autonomous self-determination in death but, given a choice, between 93.3% and 100% of patients are reluctant to self-administer (median 99.5%). If required to self-administer, fewer patients request assisted death and, of these, a sizable proportion do not self-administer but die of natural causes. This manifest avoidance runs counter to the concept of autonomous self-determination, even on the supposition that suicide could truly be autonomous. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Phenomenology, Cultural Meaning, and the Curious Case of Suicide: Localizing the Structure-Culture Dialectic.Jienian Zhang, Colter Uscola, Seth Abrutyn & Anna S. Mueller - 2024 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 54 (6):516-540.
    Sociology has largely followed Durkheim’s lead in ignoring the question: why do people die by suicide? This negation prioritizes a positivist, structuralist approach and stymies sociology’s contribution by closing off a wide range of tools sociologists might employ. An interpretivist turn in suicide studies accompanied by the growing adoption of qualitative methodology has opened up an array of opportunities to produce insights lost in a Durkheimian approach, but has yet to confront their own weaknesses. This paper shows we need not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark