Switch to: References

Citations of:

Causing Harm -- A Logico-Legal Study

Erkenntnis 44 (1):113-118 (1996)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Inter-model connectives and substructural logics.Igor Sedlár - 2014 - In Roberto Ciuni, Heinrich Wansing & Caroline Willkommen (eds.), Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic (Proceedings of Trends in Logic XI). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 195-209.
    The paper provides an alternative interpretation of ‘pair points’, discussed in Beall et al., "On the ternary relation and conditionality", J. of Philosophical Logic 41(3), 595-612. Pair points are seen as points viewed from two different ‘perspectives’ and the latter are explicated in terms of two independent valuations. The interpretation is developed into a semantics using pairs of Kripke models (‘pair models’). It is demonstrated that, if certain conditions are fulfilled, pair models are validity-preserving copies of positive substructural models. This (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Some remarks on performatives in the law.Lennart Åqvist - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):105-124.
    This paper contains an analysis of performatives with special attention to performatives in the law. It deals with the possibility to recognise performativity by means of a grammatical-syntactic criterion, the self-verifying and norm-promulgating character of legal performatives, an analysis of the effects of performatives by means of causal logic, the different forms of performativity and a theory of promise-performatives.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On the logic of causally necessary and sufficient conditions: Towards a theory of motive-explanations of human actions. [REVIEW]Lennart Åqvist - 1989 - Erkenntnis 31 (1):43 - 75.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On Rights in Game Forms.Marc Fleurbaey & Martin Van Hees - 2000 - Synthese 123 (3):295 - 326.
    This paper makes a contribution to the further development of the game-theoretic analysis of rights. The model presented here differs in several respects from the existing models. First of all, a distinction is made between outcome-oriented and action-oriented rights, a distinction which is closely related to the distinction between active and passive rights. Second, the legal-theoretic notions of negative and positive rights are formally defined. Third, we not only discuss the definition of rights, but also the way rights can be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations