Switch to: References

Citations of:

Justice and the Meritocratic State

New York: Routledge (2018)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Domain of Desert Principles for Taxation.Steven M. Sheffrin - 2018 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):220-244.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Do People Deserve Their Economic Rents?Thomas Mulligan - 2018 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):163-190.
    Rather than answering the broad question, ‘What is a just income?’, in this essay I consider one component of income—economic rent—under one understanding of justice—as giving people what they deserve. As it turns out, the answer to this more focused question is ‘no’. People do not deserve their economic rents, and there is no bar of justice to their confiscation. After briefly covering the concept of desert and explaining what economic rents are, I analyze six types of rent and show (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Wages, Talents, and Egalitarianism.Andrew Lister - 2018 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):34-56.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Just Wages, Desert, and Pay-What-You-Want Pricing.Teun Dekker - 2018 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):144-162.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why Not Be a Desertist?: Three Arguments for Desert and Against Luck Egalitarianism.Huub Brouwer & Thomas Mulligan - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (9):2271-2288.
    Many philosophers believe that luck egalitarianism captures “desert-like” intuitions about justice. Some even think that luck egalitariansm distributes goods in accordance with desert. In this paper, we argue that this is wrong. Desertism conflicts with luck egalitarianism in three important contexts, and, in these contexts, desertism renders the proper moral judgment. First, compared to desertism, luck egalitarianism is sometimes too stingy: it fails to justly compensate people for their socially valuable contributions—when those contributions arose from “option luck”. Second, luck egalitarianism (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Desert.Owen McLeod - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations