Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Myth of the Optional War: Why States Are Required to Wage the Wars They Are Permitted to Wage.Kieran Oberman - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (4):255-286.
    An “optional war” is a war that a state is permitted but not required to wage. Are there any such wars? This article assesses the two most promising arguments for optional war. (1) Permissible humanitarian wars can be so costly for soldiers and taxpayers that states are not be required them. (2) Wars of national self-defense can be discretionary: states can sometimes choose whether or not to defend themselves. The article refutes both arguments. Pace (1), states should not wage wars (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Discounting, Climate Change, and the Ecological Fallacy.Matthew Rendall - 2019 - Ethics 129 (3):441-463.
    Discounting future costs and benefits is often defended on the ground that our descendants will be richer. Simply to treat the future as better off, however, is to commit an ecological fallacy. Even if our descendants are better off when we average across climate change scenarios, this cannot justify discounting costs and benefits in possible states of the world in which they are not. Giving due weight to catastrophe scenarios requires energetic action against climate change.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Forced supererogation and deontological restrictions.Bashshar Haydar - 2002 - Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4):445-454.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations