Switch to: References

Citations of:

Spinoza, Descartes, and the "stupid Cartesians"

In Steven Nadler, Tad M. Schmaltz & Delphine Antoine-Mahut (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press (2019)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Cartesian personal metaphysics.A. M. Malivskyi - 2020 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 17:156-167.
    Purpose. To consider the personal nature of Cartesian metaphysics. Its implementation involves: a) outlining methodological changes in the philosophy of the twentieth century; b) analysis of ways to interpret anthropological component of philosophizing in Descartes studies; c) appeal to Descartes’ texts to clarify the authentic form of his interpretation of metaphysics. Theoretical basis. I base my view of Descartes’ legacy on the conceptual positions of phenomenology, existentialism and hermeneutics. Originality. Based on Descartes’ own concept of teaching, the author substantiates the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Contemporary global Descartes studies. Nadler, S. et al . The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford: Oxford UP. [REVIEW]Oleg Khoma - 2019 - Sententiae 38 (2):112-115.
    Review of the book Nadler, S. et al (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford: Oxford UP.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Сучасне глобальне декартознавство. Nadler, S. et al (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford: Oxford UP. [REVIEW]Олег Хома - 2019 - Sententiae 38 (2):112-115.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation