Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Strategies to improve the reliability of a theory: the experiment of bacterial invasion into cultured epithelial cells.Hubertus Nederbragt - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (4):593-614.
    An analysis is presented of published methods that have been used by experimenters to justify the reliability of the theory of invasion of microorganisms into cultured cells. The results show that, to demonstrate this invasion, many experimenters used two or more methods that were based on independent technical and theoretical principles, and by doing so improved the reliability of the theory. Subsequently I compare this strategy of 'multiple derivability' with other strategies, discussed in the literature in relation to the mesosome, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Cells that Count: Networks of a Diagnostic Test for Bovine Mastitis.Hubertus Nederbragt - 2015 - Social Epistemology 29 (2):234-247.
    Somatic cell count is a diagnostic test of milk for mastitis in cows. Its specificity and sensitivity are less than 1.0, making test results uncertain. I discuss epistemological problems of the test such as underdetermination, undercalibration and underdiscrimination, in the solution of which biomedical and economic factors may play a role. Diagnostics of the SCC should be considered as an epistemological network, functioning in a network in which farmers, veterinarians, epidemiologists and milk industry shift their position following biomedical, technological and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Patient Partnership in Decision-Making on Biomedical Research: Changing the Network.Joske F. G. Bunders, Jacqueline E. W. Broerse & J. Francisca Caron-Flinterman - 2007 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 32 (3):339-368.
    Participation of end users in decision-making on science is increasingly practiced, as witnessed by the growing body of scientific literature on case evaluations. In the biomedical field, however, end-user participation in decision-making is rare. Some scholars argue that because patients are stakeholders and relevant experts, they could also provide important contributions to decision-making within the field of biomedical research. But what strategies could be used to effectively implement patient participation in decision-making on biomedical research? In this article, we analyze strategies (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations