Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bioethical Boundaries, Critiques of Current Paradigms, and the Importance of Transparency.J. Clint Parker - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (1):1-17.
    This issue of The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy is dedicated to topics in clinical ethics with essays addressing clinician participation in state sponsored execution, duties to decrease ecological footprints in medicine, the concept of caring and its relationship to conscientious refusal, the dilemmas involved in dual use research, a philosophical and practical critique of principlism, conundrums that arise when applying surrogate decision-making models to patients with moderate intellectual disabilities, the phenomenology of chronic disease, and ethical concerns surrounding the use (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Health-Care Professionals and Lethal Injection: An Ethical Inquiry.Sarah K. Sawicki - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (1):18-31.
    The practice of health-care professional involvement in capital punishment has come under scrutiny since the implementation of lethal injection as a method of execution, raising questions of the goals of medicine and the ethics of medicalized procedures. The American Medical Association and other professional associations have issued statements prohibiting physician involvement in capital punishment because medicine is dedicated to preserving life. I address the three primary arguments against health-care professionals being involved in lethal injection and argue that they are not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Physician Participation in Executions, the Morality of Capital Punishment, and the Practical Implications of Their Relationship.Paul Litton - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (1):333-352.
    Over the past several years, the most widely publicized issue in capital litigation has been the constitutional status of states’ lethal injection protocols. Death row inmates have not challenged the constitutionality of lethal injection itself, but rather execution protocols and their potential for maladministration. The inmates’ concern is due to the three-drug protocol used in the vast majority of capital jurisdictions: if the anesthetic, which is administered first, is ineffectively delivered, then the second and third drugs — the paralytic and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Nurse participation in legal executions: An ethics round-table discussion.Linda Shields, Roger Watson, Philip Darbyshire, Hugh McKenna, Ged Williams, Catherine Hungerford, David Stanley, Ellen Ben-Sefer, Susan Benedict, Benny Goodman, Peter Draper & Judith Anderson - 2018 - Nursing Ethics 25 (7):841-854.
    A paper was published in 2003 discussing the ethics of nurses participating in executions by inserting the intravenous line for lethal injections and providing care until death. This paper was circulated on an international email list of senior nurses and academics to engender discussion. From that discussion, several people agreed to contribute to a paper expressing their own thoughts and feelings about the ethics of nurses participating in executions in countries where capital punishment is legal. While a range of opinions (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark