Switch to: References

Citations of:

Thus spoke Zarathustra: a book for all and none

New York: Cambrige University Press (1909)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. An Ethos of Affirmative Laughter in Nietzsche’s Zarathustra.Andrea Hurst - 2020 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 58 (4):547-573.
    In Thus Spoke Zarathustra (2006), Nietzsche presents Zarathustra as a sage and parodic prophet, who acquires and offers insight over the narrated journey of his spiritual development. Nietzsche’s conception of Zarathustra as a gift (to “all and none”) endorses learning as the kind of emulation condensed into Zarathustra’s complex formulation: rather than “corpses that I carry with me wherever I want... I need living companions who follow me because they want to follow themselves—wherever I want.” Thus I aim, firstly, to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • How to be a Terrible Teacher: Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments on what Education is not.Stuart Dalton - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (3):241-264.
    I argue for an approach to Philosophical Fragments that allows it to be philosophical and fragmentary, and that pays particular attention to the fragments, or crumbs, that seem least important. One such overlooked crumb is the theory of merely human education in the book—education that does not enlist God as the teacher, where humans simply try to teach and learn from each other. I argue that Philosophical Fragments defends this theory of education with several reductio ad absurdum proofs that are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Against 'Corporism': The Two Uses of 'I'.Galen Strawson - 2009 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 16 (4):428-448.
    In his book Individuals P. F. Strawson writes that ‘both the Cartesian and the no-ownership theorists are profoundly wrong in holding, as each must, that there are two uses of ‘I’, in one of which it denotes something which it does not denote in the other’ . I think, by contrast, that there is a defensible ‘Cartesian materialist’ sense, which Strawson need not reject, in which I can and does denote two different things, and which is nothing like the flawed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark