Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder as a Disorder of Attention.Neil Levy - 2018 - Mind and Language 33 (1):3-16.
    An influential model holds that obsessive–compulsive disorder is caused by distinctive personality traits and belief biases. But a substantial number of sufferers do not manifest these traits. I propose a predictive coding account of the disorder, which explains both the symptoms and the cognitive traits. On this account, OCD centrally involves heightened and dysfunctionally focused attention to normally unattended sensory and motor representations. As these representations have contents that predict catastrophic outcomes, patients are disposed to engage in behaviors and mental (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Discordant Knowing: A Puzzle About Insight in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder.Evan Taylor - forthcoming - Mind and Language.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Obsessive–Compulsive Akrasia.Samuel Kampa - 2020 - Mind and Language 35 (4):475-492.
    Epistemic akrasia is the phenomenon of voluntarily believing what you think you should not. Whether epistemic akrasia is possible is a matter of controversy. I argue that at least some people who suffer from obsessive–compulsive disorder are genuinely epistemically akratic. I advance an account of epistemic akrasia that explains the clinical data and provides broader insight into the nature of doxastic attitude‐formation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Teorias Híbridas Em Metaética E Folk Psychology.Eduardo Vicentini de Medeiros - 2018 - Dissertatio 47 (S6):27-48.
    O artigo argumenta por um paralelismo entre o surgimento de teorias híbridas na Metaética e novas propostas de categorização para estados mentais que tomam como base conceitos da folk psychology. São discutidos três propostas de teorias híbridas e três propostas de categorizações. Esse paralelo não é acidental, antes indica uma direção profícua para a solução do confronto entre cognitivismo e não cognitivismo, desde que os novas categorizações propostas estejam integradas em teorias da psicologia ou neurociências que apresentem suporte de evidência (...)
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark