Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. From environmental to ecological ethics: Toward a practical ethics for ecologists and conservationists.Ben A. Minteer & James P. Collins - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4):483-501.
    Ecological research and conservation practice frequently raise difficult and varied ethical questions for scientific investigators and managers, including duties to public welfare, nonhuman individuals (i.e., animals and plants), populations, and ecosystems. The field of environmental ethics has contributed much to the understanding of general duties and values to nature, but it has not developed the resources to address the diverse and often unique practical concerns of ecological researchers and managers in the field, lab, and conservation facility. The emerging field of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Welfare-based Defense of Zoos.Tzachi Zamir - 2007 - Society and Animals 15 (2):191-201.
    A "welfare-based defense" of a practice involving nonhuman animals presents the examined practice as promoting the animal's own interests. Such justifications surface in relation to various interactions between human and nonhuman animals. Sometimes such arguments appear persuasive. Sometimes they form self-serving rationalizations. This paper attempts to clarify and specify the distinction between plausible and dubious applications of such arguments. It then examines a detailed welfare-based defense of zoos.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Editors' Overview: The Emergence of Ecological Ethics. [REVIEW]Ben A. Minteer, James P. Collins & Stephanie J. Bird - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4):473-481.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Using an ecological ethics framework to make decisions about the relocation of wildlife.Earl D. McCoy & Kristin Berry - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4):505-521.
    Relocation is an increasingly prominent conservation tool for a variety of wildlife, but the technique also is controversial, even among conservation practitioners. An organized framework for addressing the moral dilemmas often accompanying conservation actions such as relocation has been lacking. Ecological ethics may provide such a framework and appears to be an important step forward in aiding ecological researchers and biodiversity managers to make difficult moral choices. A specific application of this framework can make the reasoning process more transparent and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations