Switch to: References

Citations of:

Albins Prolog Und Die Dialogtheorie des Platonismus

Stuttgart: De Gruyter. Edited by Albinus (1991)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Rationality, Eros, and Daemonic Influence in the Platonic Theages and the Academy of Polemo and Crates.Kurt Lampe - 2013 - American Journal of Philology 134 (3):383-424.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The starting point and the correct order of the study in Albinus’ Prologue: a new solution.Vasyl Matskiv - 2022 - Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought) 2:170-177.
    The article refers to a long-standing dispute over the relations between the two orders of study of Plato’s dialogues in the Prologue of Albinus (Ch. V and Ch. VI, respectively). The dominant solu- tions are identified: 1) the acceptance of the first curriculum as «for amateurs» and the second curriculum as «for professional platonists» (J. Freudenthal, O. Nüsser, J. Mansfeld); 2) the treat- ment of the first course as a short introduction to the second (B. Reis). On the grounds of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Endoxa and Epistemology in Aristotle’s Topics.Joseph Bjelde - 2021 - In Joseph Andrew Bjelde, David Merry & Christopher Roser (eds.), Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity. Cham: Springer. pp. 201-214.
    What role, if any, does dialectic play in Aristotle’s epistemology in the Topics? In this paper I argue that it does play a role, but a role that is independent of endoxa. In the first section, I sketch the case for thinking that dialectic plays a distinctively epistemological role—not just a methodological role, or a merely instrumental role in getting episteme. In the second section, I consider three ways it could play that role, on two of which endoxa play at (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Seneca’s Argumentation and Moral Intuitionism.David Merry - 2021 - In Joseph Andrew Bjelde, David Merry & Christopher Roser (eds.), Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity. Cham: Springer. pp. 231-243.
    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues that moral disagreement and widespread moral bias pose a serious problem for moral intuitionism. Seneca’s view that we just recognise the good could be criticised using a similar argument. His approach to argumentation offers a way out, one that may serve as a model for a revisionary intuitionism.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark