Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Husserl, Weber, Freud, and the method of the human sciences.Donald McIntosh - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (3):328-353.
    In the debate between the natural science and the phenomenological or hermeneutical approaches in the human sciences, a third alternative described by Husserl has been widely ignored. Contrary to frequent assumptions, Husserl believed that a purely phenomenological method is not generally the appropriate approach for the empirical human sciences. Rather, he held that although they can and should make important use of phenomenological analysis, such sciences should take their basic stance in the "natural attitude," the ordinary commonsense lifeworld mode of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Intentionality and Narrativity in Phenomenological Psychological Research: Reflections on Husserl and Ricoeur.Marc H. Applebaum - 2014 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 14 (2):1-19.
    According to Husserlian scholars such as Mohanty, description and interpretation coexist within Husserl’s work and are envisioned as complementary rather than mutually exclusive approaches to inquiry. This paper argues that exploring the implications of this philosophical complementarity for psychological research would require distinguishing between both the multiple meanings of “interpretation” and the differing modes of interpretation within qualitative data. Husserl’s model of passive and active intentionality and Ricoeur’s theory of narrativity are examined in order to explore their relevance for research. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation