Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Sacred Matter: Reflections on the Relationship of Karmic and Natural Causality in Jaina Philosophy. [REVIEW]Peter Flügel - 2012 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 40 (2):119-176.
    The article examines a fundamental problem in classical Jaina philosophy, namely, the ontological status of dead matter in the hylozoistic and at the same time dualistic Jaina worldview. This question is of particular interest in view of the widespread contemporary Jaina practice of venerating bone relics and stūpas of prominent saints. The main argument proposed in this article is, that, from a classical doctrinal point of view, bone relics of renowned ascetics are valuable for Jainas, if at all, because of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Recent Works on the Rigveda.E. V. Arnold - 1900 - The Classical Review 14 (01):55-62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mahān puruṣaḥ: The Macranthropic Soul in Brāhmaṇas and Upaniṣads.Per-Johan Norelius - 2017 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 45 (3):403-472.
    The concept of the mahant- ātman-, or “vast self”, found in some of the Early and Middle Upaniṣads, has, at least since the days of Hermann Oldenberg, been explored by a number of scholars, most notably by van Buitenen :103–114, 1964). These studies have usually emphasized the cosmic implications of this concept; the vast ātman- being the non-individualized spirit that brings forth and pervades the universe, then enters the bodies of all created beings as their animating principle. As such it (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • More Suttas on Sakka and why the Shorter Chinese Sa?yukta-?gama should not be attributed to the K??yap?ya school.Marcus Bingenheimer - 2009 - Buddhist Studies Review 26 (2):127-153.
    This article is part of a series on the Shorter Chinese Sa?yukta-?gama. Continuing the investigation from previous research on the provenance of the BZA, it is concluded that the attribution of the BZA to the K??yap?ya school is mistaken. A comparison of the BZA’s?akra-sa?yukta with the P?li Sakka-sa?yutta shows that, with minor exceptions, the narrative content of both sa?yuttas is identical though the number of suttas varies. Finally, the article completes the translation of the?akra-sa?yukta, the first part of which appeared (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation