- Algorithmic Opinion Mining and the History of Philosophy: A Response to Mizrahi’s For and Against Scientism.Andreas Vrahimis - 2023 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (5):33-41.details
|
|
Political Philosophy, Political Theory, and the Analytic-Continental Divide: A Critical Notice by Andreas Vrahimis of: Across the Great Divide: Between Analytic and Continental Political Theory, by Jeremy Arnold, Stanford University Press, 2020, 232 pp., $29.52 (paperback), ISBN 9781503612150. [REVIEW]Andreas Vrahimis - 2022 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 30 (1):86-101.details
|
|
Neurath’s debate with Horkheimer and the critique of Verstehen.Andreas Vrahimis - 2022 - In Adam Tamas Tuboly (ed.), The history of understanding in analytic philosophy: around logical empiricism. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.details
|
|
Philosophy (and Wissenschaft) without Politics? Schlick on Nietzsche, German Idealism, and Militarism.Andreas Vrahimis - 2021 - In Christian Damböck & Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.), The Socio-Ethical Dimension of Knowledge: The Mission of Logical Empiricism. Springer. pp. 53-84.details
|
|
Cassirer and Goldstein on Abstraction and the Autonomy of Biology.M. Chirimuuta - 2020 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2):471-503.details
|
|
Horkheimer, lector del positivismo. Un análisis crítico de la interpretación horkheimeriana del positivismo en sus textos tempranos.Adriana Gonzalo & Paula García Cherep - 2019 - Dianoia 64 (83):49-77.details
|
|
Intersubjective Accountability: Politics and Philosophy in the Left Vienna Circle.Thomas Uebel - 2020 - Perspectives on Science 28 (1):35-62.details
|
|
Language, Truth, and Logic and the Anglophone reception of the Vienna Circle.Andreas Vrahimis - 2021 - In Adam Tamas Tuboly (ed.), The Historical and Philosophical Significance of Ayer’s Language, Truth and Logic. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave. pp. 41-68.details
|
|
Neurath on Verstehen.Thomas Uebel - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 27 (4):912-938.details
|
|
Compte-rendu: Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science.David Ludwig - 2015 - Lato Sensu: Revue de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences 2 (1):14-16.details
|
|
Carnapian explication and ameliorative analysis: a systematic comparison.Catarina Dutilh Novaes - 2020 - Synthese 197 (3):1011-1034.details
|
|
Reactionaries of the lectern: Universalism, anti-empiricism and corporatism in Austrian (and German) social theory.Silvia Rief & Alan Scott - 2021 - European Journal of Social Theory 24 (2):285-305.details
|
|
Rudolf Carnap’s Incorporation of the Geisteswissenschaften in the Aufbau.Fons Dewulf - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (2):199-225.details
|
|
What’s right about Carnap, Neurath and the Left Vienna Circle thesis: a refutation.Thomas Uebel - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):214-221.details
|
|
Political philosophy of science in logical empiricism: the left Vienna Circle.Thomas Uebel - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):754-773.details
|
|
“It Would be Helpful to Know Which Textbook Teaches the ‘Dialectic’ he Advocates.” Inserting Lukács into the Neurath–Horkheimer Debate.Paolo Tripodi - 2024 - Open Philosophy 7 (1):19-39.details
|
|