Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Craig’s Kalam Cosmology.Graham Oppy - 2009 - Philo 12 (2):200-216.
    Hypotheses about the shape of causal reality admit of both theistic and non-theistic interpretations. I argue that, on the simplest hypotheses about the causal shape of reality—infinite regress, contingent initial boundary, necessary initial boundary—there is good reason to suppose that non-theism is always either preferable to, or at least the equal of, theism, at least insofar as we restrict our attention merely to the domain of explanation of existence. Moreover, I suggest that it is perfectly proper for naturalists to be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Pantheist in Spite of Himself: Craig, Hegel, and Divine Infinity.Russell Dumke - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (3):243-257.
    In his 2006 paper `Pantheists in Spite of Themselves: God and Infinity in Contemporary Theology,’ William Lane Craig examines the work of Wolfhart Pannenberg, Philip Clayton, and F. LeRon Shults, whose conceptions of God are influenced by Hegel. Craig shows that these thinkers’ Hegelian formulations lead to monism, despite their attempts to avoid it. He then attempts to refute Hegelian thinking by appealing to Cantor. I argue that that this refutation fails because Cantor and Hegel are far more amicable than (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Is an Infinite Temporal Regress of Events Possible?Andrew Ter Ern Loke - 2012 - Think 11 (31):105-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations