Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Whose harm? Which metaphysic?Abram Brummett - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (1):43-61.
    Douglas Diekema has argued that it is not the best interest standard, but the harm principle that serves as the moral basis for ethicists, clinicians, and the courts to trigger state intervention to limit parental authority in the clinic. Diekema claims the harm principle is especially effective in justifying state intervention in cases of religiously motivated medical neglect in pediatrics involving Jehovah’s Witnesses and Christian Scientists. I argue that Diekema has not articulated a harm principle that is capable of justifying (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • A Qualitative Research Survey on Cardiologist’s Ethical Stance in Cases of Moral Dilemmas in Cardiology Clinics.Banu Buruk, Perihan Elif Ekmekci, Aksüyek Savaş Çelebi & Begüm Güneş - forthcoming - Health Care Analysis:1-21.
    This study sought to determine cardiologists’ degrees of ethical awareness and preferred courses of action for ethical dilemmas frequently encountered in clinical settings. For this evaluation, an online survey was created and sent to cardiologists affiliated with various academic posts in Ankara, Turkey. The survey included ten cases with various ethical considerations selected from our book, “Clinic Ethics with Cases from Cardiology.” Four possible action choices were defined for each case. Participants were asked to choose one or more of these (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Medically Valid Religious Beliefs.Gregory Bock - 2012 - Dissertation,
    This dissertation explores conflicts between religion and medicine, cases in which cultural and religious beliefs motivate requests for inappropriate treatment or the cessation of treatment, requests that violate the standard of care. I call such requests M-requests (miracle or martyr requests). I argue that current approaches fail to accord proper respect to patients who make such requests. Sometimes they are too permissive, honoring M-requests when they should not; other times they are too strict. I propose a phronesis-based approach to decide (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Kommentar II.Gisela Bockenheimer-Lucius - 2001 - Ethik in der Medizin 13 (1-2):131-133.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation