Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Libyan Management Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making.Ahmed Musbah, Christopher J. Cowton & David Tyfa - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 134 (3):335-358.
    This study investigates the association of a broad set of variables with the ethical decision making of management accountants in Libya. Adopting a cross-sectional methodology, a questionnaire including four different ethical scenarios was used to gather data from 229 participants. For each scenario, ethical decision making was examined in terms of the recognition, judgment and intention stages of Rest’s model. A significant relationship was found between ethical recognition and ethical judgment and also between ethical judgment and ethical intention, but ethical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Improving Diversification Opportunities for Socially Responsible Investors.María del Mar Miralles-Quirós & José Luis Miralles-Quirós - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 140 (2):339-351.
    Socially responsible investment has grown enormously and has expanded globally in recent years. It allows SRI investors to reduce their portfolio risk assumptions through international diversification. In this context, the aim of this paper is twofold to examine price and volatility linkages among the most representative SRI indexes for North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific employing a multivariate approach and to provide the out-of-sample performance of an optimal portfolio constructed on the basis of time-varying return and volatility forecasts from this specification (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Evaluation of the Cultural Environment’s Impact on the Performance of the Socially Responsible Investment Funds.Francisco José López-Arceiz, Ana José Bellostas-Pérezgrueso & José Mariano Moneva - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 150 (1):259-278.
    Socially responsible mutual funds match financial and environmental, social, and governance criteria in their portfolio management strategies. Several studies have examined the behavior of these funds in terms of return–risk, obtaining very different results. The present study discusses previous results and shows how these funds often outperform their conventional counterparts. Rather than the SR character of a mutual fund, a relevant explanation for this behavior is the cultural environment in which the fund operates. Thus, the ethical framework or corporate social (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark