Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Case for Emissions Egalitarianism.Olle Torpman - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3):749-762.
    There is a fixed limit on the greenhouse gas emissions that the atmosphere can absorb before triggering dangerous climate changes. One of the debates in climate ethics concerns how the available emissions should be divided between people. One popular answer, sometimes called “Emissions Egalitarianism” (EE), proposes a distribution of emissions permits that gives everyone an equal per capita share of the atmospheric absorptive capacity. However, several debaters have objected to EE. First, it has been argued that there is no principled (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Water Justice: A Multilayer Term and Its Role in Cooperation.Angela Kallhoff - 2014 - Analyse & Kritik 36 (2):367-382.
    In discussing water justice, this paper distinguishes four concepts of water justice: Distributive justice claims a fair share of water, ecological justice focuses on the integrity of water as a vulnerable resource, cultural justice addresses values attached to water reservoirs, and procedural justice explicates fair procedures in negotiating water conflicts. After having given an overview over recent contributions to the various meanings of water justice, the paper tries to answer the question of how standards of justice can be integrated into (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • COP20's Ethical Fallout: The Perils of Principles Without Dialogue.Hugh Breakey - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (2):155-168.
    I argue that mechanisms currently embedded in the Paris negotiations Elements Text could elicit a structured process of moral dialogue. These mechanisms go beyond inviting Parties to cloak their intended nationally determined contributions in specious moral garb; the mechanisms envisage a principled review of, and dialogic reflection on, the fairness and ambition of Parties' INDCs. These mechanisms could thus propel moral dialogue, leading to constructive shifts in Parties' perspectives and commitments. The drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation