Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A hypothesis for chromatin domain opening.Li Xin, De-Pei Liu & Chih-Chuan Ling - 2003 - Bioessays 25 (5):507-514.
    The eukaryotic genome is organized into different domains by cis‐acting elements, such as boundaries/insulators and matrix attachment regions, and is packaged with different degrees of condensation. In the M phase, the chromatin becomes further highly condensed into chromosomes. The first step for transcriptional activation of a given gene, at a particular time during development, in any locus, is the opening of its chromatin domain. This locus needs to be kept in this state in each early G1 phase during every cell (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A small issue addressed.Tina L. Gumienny & Richard W. Padgett - 2003 - Bioessays 25 (4):305-308.
    Cell size is an important determinant of body size. While the genetic mechanisms of cell size regulation have been well studied in yeast, this process has only recently been addressed in multicellular organisms. One recent report by Wang et al. (2002) shows that in the nematode C. elegans, the TGFβ‐like pathway acts in the hypodermis to regulate cell size and consequently body size.1 This finding is an exciting step in discovering the molecular mechanisms that control cell and body size. BioEssays (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Phylogenomics of type II DNA topoisomerases.Danièle Gadelle, Jonathan Filée, Cyril Buhler & Patrick Forterre - 2003 - Bioessays 25 (3):232-242.
    Type II DNA topoisomerases (Topo II) are essential enzymes implicated in key nuclear processes. The recent discovery of a novel kind of Topo II (DNA topoisomerase VI) in Archaea led to a division of these enzymes into two non‐homologous families, (Topo IIA and Topo IIB) and to the identification of the eukaryotic protein that initiates meiotic recombination, Spo11. In the present report, we have updated the distribution of all Topo II in the three domains of life by a phylogenomic approach. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Can't get no SMADisfaction: Smad proteins as positive and negative regulators of TGF‐β family signals.Jan L. Christian & Takuya Nakayama - 1999 - Bioessays 21 (5):382-390.
    The identification of Smad proteins as molecular components of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling cascade has enhanced our understanding of how ligand-mediated activation of TGF-β receptors leads to modulation of target gene transcription. Recent studies have identified a distinct, structurally related class of Smads which inhibits, rather than transduces, TGF-β family signals. The molecular mechanism of action and the exact signaling pathways that are targeted by antagonistic Smads are not completely understood. These proteins appear to participate in autoregulatory negative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Organ formation in Drosophila: Specification and morphogenesis of the salivary gland.Pamela L. Bradley, Adam S. Haberman & Deborah J. Andrew - 2001 - Bioessays 23 (10):901-911.
    The Drosophila salivary gland has emerged as an outstanding model system for the process of organ formation. Many of the component steps, from initial regional specification through cell specialization and morphogenesis, are known and many of the genes required for these different processes have been identified. The salivary gland is a relatively simple organ; the entire gland comprises of only two major cell types, which derive from a single contiguous primordium. Salivary cells cease dividing once they are specified, and organ (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark