Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Exploitative, irresistible, and coercive offers: why research participants should be paid well or not at all.Sara Belfrage - 2016 - Journal of Global Ethics 12 (1):69-86.
    ABSTRACTThis paper begins with the assumption that it is morally problematic when people in need are offered money in exchange for research participation if the amount offered is unfair. Such offers are called ‘coercive’, and the degree of coerciveness is determined by the offer's potential to cause exploitation and its irresistibility. Depending on what view we take on the possibility to compensate for the sacrifices made by research participants, a wish to avoid ‘coercive offers’ leads to policy recommendations concerning payment (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Questioning Assumptions About Vulnerability in Psychiatric Patients.Melissa D. McCradden & Michael D. Cusimano - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (4):221-223.
    In their target article, Lawrence and colleagues (2019) demonstrate a wealth of insight into the thought processes surrounding decisions to participate in deep brain stimulation (DBS) research tria...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ethical Issues in Deep Brain Stimulation Research for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Focus on Risk and Consent.Laura B. Dunn, Paul E. Holtzheimer, Jinger G. Hoop, Helen S. Mayberg, Laura Weiss Roberts & Paul S. Appelbaum - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (1):29-36.
    Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is currently in pivotal trials as an intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although offering hope for TRD, DBS also provokes ethical concerns—particularly about decision-making capacity of people with depression—among bioethicists, investigators, institutional review boards, and the public. Here, we examine this critical issue of informed consent for DBS research using available evidence regarding decision-making capacity and depression. Further, we explore the implications of the nature of TRD as well as that of the intervention (invasive brain surgery) (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Uterine transplantation: a step too far?Jeanette Foley - 2012 - Clinical Ethics 7 (4):193-198.
    The options currently available to women with uterine infertility are adoption or surrogacy. Recently the option of uterine transplantation has been explored which would allow a woman to carry her own genetically related child. Although this type of transplant raises similar ethical considerations to other types of non-life-saving organ transplantation, such as facial tissue and limb, it also raises its own very unique considerations. In this paper, some of the considerations surrounding uterine transplantation, such as informed consent and an individual's (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation