Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Three proposals for rewarding novel health technologies benefiting people living in poverty. A comparative analysis of prize funds, health impact funds and a cost-effectiveness/competitive tender treaty.Thomas Alured Faunce & Hitoshi Nasu - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):146-153.
    Thomas Alured Faunce, College of Law, Fellows Road, Acton, Canberra ACT 0200, Australian National University, Fax: 61 2 61253971, Email: Thomas.Faunce{at}anu.edu.au ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//-->This paper sets out to analyse three different academic proposals for addressing the needs of the poor in relation to new, rather than ‘essential’ medicines. It focuses particularly on research and development prize funds, a health impact fund system and a multilateral treaty on health technology cost-effectiveness evaluation and competitive tender. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations