Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.R. G. Jepson - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):192-196.
    Informed choice is increasingly recognised as important in supporting patient autonomy and ensuring that people are neither deceived nor coerced. In cancer screening the emphasis has shifted away from just promoting the benefits of screening to providing comprehensive information to enable people to make an informed choice. Cancer screening programmes in the UK now have policies in place which state that it is their responsibility to ensure that individuals are making an individual informed choice. There is a need to evaluate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Clinical issues on consent: some philosophical concerns.R. Worthington - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6):377-380.
    On occasions, laws on consent are subject to modification, largely on account of being subject to common law rather than statute—for example, in the UK. Guideline publications such as the UK Department of Health Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment are intended to provide information for clinicians on when and how to apply current laws in everyday clinical situations. While the extent to which guidelines influence clinician behaviour depends on how much they are read and followed, what is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations