Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bibliography.[author unknown] - 2017 - In Tze-Ki Hon (ed.), Confucianism for the contemporary world: global order, political plurality, and social action. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. pp. 243-265.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Limits of Empathy - A Mengzi 'an Perspective'.Galia Patt-Shamir - 2010 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):253-274.
    This article suggests how Mengzian ideas of the way [dao], rightness [yi] and rites [li], as related to the presupposition that human nature is moral, respond to rigid notions of “truth” and “law,” which tolerate a banalization of evil. It further suggests that the Mengzian attitude is both rooted in human empathy and draws clear limits to it. This is demonstrated by responding to arguments raised by the protagonist Max Aue in Jonathan Little’s book The Kindly Ones.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Confucianism for the contemporary world: global order, political plurality, and social action.Tze-Ki Hon (ed.) - 2017 - Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Discusses contemporary Confucianism's relevance and its capacity to address pressing social and political issues of twenty-first-century life. Condemned during the Maoist era as a relic of feudalism, Confucianism enjoyed a robust revival in post-Mao China as China’s economy began its rapid expansion and gradual integration into the global economy. Associated with economic development, individual growth, and social progress by its advocates, Confucianism became a potent force in shaping politics and society in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and overseas Chinese communities. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark