Switch to: References

Citations of:

The natural world as a philosophical problem

Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. Edited by Ivan Chvatík, Lubica Učník, Erika Abrams & Ludwig Landgrebe (2016)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Hubris of Transcendental Idealism: Understanding Patočka's Early Concept of the Lifeworld.Martin Ritter - 2018 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 49 (2):171-181.
    Jan Patočka’s early phenomenology, as presented in The Natural World as a Philosophical Problem, does not merely adopt Husserl’s concept of the lifeworld. The paper demonstrates the originality of Patočka’s appropriation of this concept, but also its internal tensions and difficulties. Seeking to elaborate a concept of a phenomenology allowing for a theory of the lifeworld stricto sensu, i.e. of the life of the world, Patočka’s book effectively shows that there is no ahistorical, absolute or “natural” starting point for phenomenology. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Patočka’s Care of the Soul Reconsidered: Performing the Soul Through Movement.Martin Ritter - 2017 - Human Studies 40 (2):233-247.
    Care of the soul is arguably the core concept in Patočka’s phenomenology. However, what is the soul? In this paper I seek to determine its ontological meaning, connecting the concept of caring for the soul with that of the movement of existence. Starting from Patočka’s affirmative presentation of Aristotle’s criticism of Plato, I interrogate the “orthodox” Platonic concept of caring for the soul and develop an alternative notion, putting emphasis on action in the world. I demonstrate the impossibility of identifying (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reduction and the Question of Beginnings in Husserl, Fink and Patočka.Witold Płotka - 2018 - Human Studies 41 (4):603-621.
    The article is an attempt to define reduction as the beginning of philosophy. The author considers such questions as: What motivates a phenomenologist to do reduction? Can one speak of philosophy before reduction? What is the essence of reduction? To answer these questions the author refers to Husserl, Fink and, Patočka, and tries to show that reduction is to be understood as an unmotivated expression of philosopher’s will to overcome evidence inherent to natural attitude. The author argues that reduction enables (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations